It is important, in that case, not to speak of them in the way one would speak of cold-hearted jerk faces. Also, this discussion hasn't in fact even been about comp organizer *actions*. It's not as though we're talking about distribution of heart-damaging weight loss supplements, or insistence on using a dangerously slippery floor coating that makes the ballroom more photogenic, or anything like that. Rather, we're talking about some set of things (on which even we don't all agree) that we suppose comp organizers should do but don't. Then the case is made, "they don't do <things>, therefore they don't care about competitor health." That's a dehumanizing, unnecessary, and logically incorrect inference. I stand by my assertion that it is more useful anyway to talk about "comps that do or don't have AEDs" rather than to talk about "comps that do or don't value competitor health".